Advertisement. Advertise with us

Letter from Hilda Wilcox

It makes no sense

How much sense does it make that our supposedly civilized country allows the sale of AR-15-style assault weapons that can — and do — kill 20 or more people in minutes? Is that a freedom necessary to a democracy?

Should anyone who can find the money to buy such a mass-killer weapon feel free to unleash such mortal terror?
A few facts: Such a gun used in Highland Park, Illinois; Uvalde, Texas; and Buffalo, New York can fire up to 100 rounds without pausing to reload. Adam Lanza in Sandy Hook, Connecticut, fired 154 rounds in 264 seconds.

Are we willing to let our gun manufacturers increase their profits at the expense of the lives of so many Americans, young and old?

Are the profits of these gun manufacturers in greater need of protection than the lives of the people their guns have killed?

Hilda Wilcox
Cooperstown

Posted

4 Comments

  1. It is a horrible thing and I am in agreement that anyone under 18 unless in the military should not be able to buy one. However if we think making illegal to buy theses rifles is going to stop the carnage think again. Fentanyl is illegal. Opium is illegal. Etc. Criminals don’t abide by laws. As a society we need a more effective approach. That is the challenge

  2. It is a horrible thing and I am in agreement that anyone under 18 unless in the military should not be able to buy one. However if we think making illegal to buy theses rifles is going to stop the carnage think again. Fentanyl is illegal. Opium is illegal. Etc. Criminals don’t abide by laws. As a society we need a more effective approach. That is the challenge

  3. Military weapons of war – including ammunition that travels 3x faster than pistol bullets and is meant to fragment when slamming into flesh (thus to kill humans, not animals that are legally hunted) – should indeed be banned, and not just to juveniles! No, such a ban would not end American “carnage” but it would reduce some mass murders and senseless violence. And it would reduce the profits that US gun manufacturers reep as long as we tolerate practices that more civilized societies prohibit!

  4. Military weapons of war – including ammunition that travels 3x faster than pistol bullets and is meant to fragment when slamming into flesh (thus to kill humans, not animals that are legally hunted) – should indeed be banned, and not just to juveniles! No, such a ban would not end American “carnage” but it would reduce some mass murders and senseless violence. And it would reduce the profits that US gun manufacturers reep as long as we tolerate practices that more civilized societies prohibit!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

Butterman: Too Much Gun Violence

Letter from Dan Butterman Too Much Gun Violence Gun violence takes the lives of too many New Yorkers, and it is taking more and more each year. When elected to the Assembly I will work to make our gun laws fairer and more effective. I will not take weapons away from law-abiding citizens, but will work to take them away from criminals. And I will do this with input from gun violence experts – law enforcement professionals. In 2014, gun-related deaths in the U.S. numbered 33,508, but by 2020 that had risen to 45,055. Nearly every state has experienced an…

deBLIECK: Governed Also Can ‘Regulate’

LETTER from GARRETT deBLIECK Governed Also Can ‘Regulate’ To the Editor: It is ironic that those who achieved an impressive education simultaneously lack the very basics of Constitutional study. Upon the current topic of the Second Amendment seems to illustrate this dichotomy quite well. The notion that the word “regulated” applies only to that of the government is both taking words out of context and as completely ignoring the very function of the Bill of Rights in the first place. To exemplify this, the Second Amendment states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to secure a free state, the Right of…

Trustees Agree To Remove Sign That Angered Residents

Trustees Agree To Remove Sign That Angered Residents By GREG KLEIN • Special to www.AllOTSEGO.com The village of Cooperstown will remove a controversial solar-powered speed limit sign from Pioneer Street. The village’s Board of Trustees voted unanimously Monday, April 26, to remove the sign, which was in front of 100 Pioneer Street and told motorists heading south on Pioneer if they were exceeding the village’s 30-mile-per-hour speed limit. The meeting was held in person in the village ballroom at 22 Main St. As part of the motion, the trustees agreed to relocate the sign to the southern entryway to the…