Advertisement. Advertise with us

Otsego Board of Reps Weighs
Opposition to State Budget Rules

OTSEGO COUNTY

Last Wednesday, the Otsego County Board of Representatives heard concerns from three area residents about the threats to home rule posed by Part N of the Article VII Executive Revenue Bill contained in Governor Kathy Hochul’s Budget Proposal.

Dan Sullivan of Richfield, Nathan Seamon of Columbia in nearby Herkimer County, and Keith Schue of Cherry Valley all urged the county representatives to oppose Part N.

Essentially, Part N—which is opposed by the New York Association of Counties—removes the right of municipalities to assess taxes for large scale solar, wind and battery storage projects that locate within their boundaries. Instead, the assessment power is given to the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance to adopt a model that is currently being challenged in court. And, it backdates this authority to 2021.

In his remarks to the County Board, Nate Seamon, who heads a grass-roots group called Protect Columbia, pointed out the erosion of the principle of home rule going back to 2019.

“94-c, and now Part N, are directly aimed at dismantling local communities’ authority to govern themselves. This appears to go against Article IX of the state Constitution, which enshrines home Rule,” he stated.

94c refers to an executive law that bypasses local zoning and land-use regulations for large-scale renewable projects if the local laws are deemed to be “burdensome” by the Office of Renewable Energy Siting.

Keith Schue, an engineer by profession who has been involved in state energy policy for many years, echoed and amplified Seamon’s comments.

“The Part N provision…perpetuates the attack on home rule. First you had Article X, then 94-c pushed by Cuomo, which basically made it impossible for communities to affect these projects,” Schue said. “And now we have a state-mandated appraisal model which is another gift to the solar/wind lobby—one that prevents local governments and school districts from receiving adequate revenue for the projects they are forced to host.

“Part N takes that even further, making it impossible to even question or challenge the new model being mandated, and denying due process to communities,” emphasized Schue.

For its part, the Board of Representatives responded quickly to the comments, voting unanimously to authorize Chairperson David Bliss to sign and send a letter of opposition to the Governor. An attempt to pass an accompanying resolution of opposition was temporarily tabled, as more time was needed to craft the language.

Dan Sullivan is the supervisor of the Town of Richfield.

Posted

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Related Articles

County Takes Ownership of Huntington Farm

On Tuesday, May 19, the Otsego County Board of Representatives announced the purchase of the Cooperstown Holstein property, also known as the Huntington Farm.…
May 21, 2026

Board Reviews Ag District, Lauds Retirees

Following brief special meetings of the Public Works and Administration committees, the May 6 session of the Otsego County Board of Representatives began with a public hearing on the eight-year review of Agricultural District #1.…
May 14, 2026

News Briefs: April 16, 2026

Funding and scholarship opportunities with the Rotary Club of Cooperstown and Butternut Valley Alliance, CCS softball and baseball updates, and various upcoming presentations are among the topics covered in this week's news briefs.…
April 16, 2026

PUTTING THE COMMUNITY BACK INTO THE NEWSPAPER

For a limited time, subscribers to AllOtsego.com pay a reduced rate ($25.00 for one year) and can choose to have $5.00 of the subscription fee donated toward refurbishment of Otsego County’s Civil War Memorial.

Visit our “subscribe” page to sign up